The Importance of Monitoring Activities in a Security Program

With the growing number of cyberattacks and malicious activities targeting organizations of all sizes, it has become essential for businesses to implement robust security measures to protect their sensitive data and maintain their reputation. However, one often overlooked component in any security program is the monitoring activities that the company employs to evaluate the program’s effectiveness continuously.

Deploying security controls is not a one-time exercise. A security program is only effective if it is continuously updated, relevant, and aligned with the business’s objectives. Formal monitoring procedures are crucial to maintaining effective security and internal controls, ensuring business management has the information necessary to make informed decisions.

Let’s review the basics of monitoring activities and how they are necessary for a security program’s effectiveness.

 

Automated Tools For Monitoring Procedures

Monitoring procedures are generally required by most security and internal control frameworks, such as SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and can take a variety of forms. A mix of automated and manual controls is generally a good idea. There are many tools on the market designed to automate certain monitoring functions. Governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platforms can serve as a risk and control register and can monitor the operation of certain controls. These tools are particularly helpful with smaller organizations with less complexity and who may not have internal expertise. More technical software such as security information and event monitoring (SIEM) platforms and automated vulnerability scanning tools are useful to notify appropriate personnel of anomalous activity in your technical infrastructure or of common vulnerabilities present in your network or application. Even modern project management and ticketing solutions are a great way to automate the tracking of tasks and enforce accountabilities. Automated monitoring activities are often built into the ongoing operations of the business and can be great barometers of real-time data.

 

Manual Monitoring Activities

Despite the many benefits of automating monitoring activities, relying solely on them is not recommended. Manual monitoring activities are often more critical than their automated counterparts. By leveraging manual activities to interpret data compiled from tools and evaluate controls’ appropriateness as the business changes, organizations can identify inefficiencies and opportunities for improvement.

Activities such as regular internal audits, risk assessments, and standardized reporting to executives are best-practice monitoring procedures. Such practices allow executives and stakeholders to make informed decisions about the value the security program brings to the business and take action on perceived risks.

Manual monitoring activities should be built into the governance structure of the security program. Such as the establishment of a Security Steering Committee that meets quarterly to establish objectives, assess KPIs, evaluate risks, assess program metrics, compile data from tools for analysis, etc.

Risk assessment activities should be a manual exercise. While applications can be leveraged to manage and compile risk data, only a human can identify, assess, and determine appropriate mitigation strategies for your specific business.

Over-reliance on automation in this area often leads to inefficiencies in security program design or, more importantly, unidentified risk factors that may have been obvious to company personnel. Monitoring your risk profile and managing pertinent risks is critical to internal control. 

 

Proactive Monitoring for Maximum Results

Implementing explicit monitoring protocols for security and compliance programs is essential to maximize the program’s effectiveness. Effective monitoring activities should provide security and executive management with sufficient information to make educated decisions about where to deploy resources to maximize the program’s value. Organizations should use a mix of automated and manual activities built into both daily operations as well as intentional regular assessments. Well-designed monitoring activities are a key indicator of a well-designed security and compliance program.

Want more content like this? Follow us on LinkedIn or hit the button below to speak with an expert!

Written By:

Dale Crump

Dale Crump is the Founder Managing Partner of AssurancePoint. Dale has over a decade of experience in information security auditing, governance, risk, compliance, and internal control frameworks. Dale is the SOC examination practice lead at AssurancePoint and has personally contributed to the issuance of hundreds of audit reports for companies in various industries including healthcare, financial technology, information privacy, legal, gaming, managed services, marketing, logistics, etc. Dale is a strong advocate of advancing quality in the security and compliance industry and delivering value to his clients. Dale is licensed certified public accountant (CPA) and also hold various other industry and security specific certifications including Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP), Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA), Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP), Certificate of Cloud Security Knowledge (CCSK), ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, Advanced SOC for Service Organizations credential, among others. Dale is active member of the AICPA, Georgia Society of CPAs, ISACA, ISC2, and the IAPP.
Security Events vs. Security Incidents

Security Events vs. Security Incidents

In the world of cybersecurity, a common misunderstanding often exists within organizations - the distinction between security events and security incidents. We audit a lot of organizations’ incident management protocols, and the lack of a distinction between event...

How to Evaluate Auditors 2

How to Evaluate Auditors

Selecting an audit firm can, and probably should, feel daunting. After all, you hopefully will work with this firm for many years to come, so it shouldn’t be a rushed decision. Many organizations make the mistake of letting cost be the primary driver of choosing an...

Factors That Create a Positive Compliance Experience

Factors That Create a Positive Compliance Experience

There is no doubt in my mind that I have seen vastly more audit horror stories and unsatisfied auditees on public forums and social media than I have seen people raving about a positive audit experience. Auditing is an extremely tough profession, and we auditors...

How to Prepare for a SOC 2 Security Assessment 2

How to Prepare for a SOC 2 Security Assessment

Security assessments, such as SOC 2 reports, are increasingly becoming a requirement in modern business. Organizations often approach us needing a SOC 2 but need help knowing where to start. So, let's break down the significant steps in preparing for a SOC 2....

What Are SOC Reports – The Basics 2

What Are SOC Reports – The Basics

Introduction System and Organization Controls (SOC) reports have become one of the most common methods for organizations to demonstrate their services and provide stakeholders assurance over their internal control environments. SOC reports can seem like a very...

What Is A SOC 1 And Do You Need One

What Is a SOC 1 and Do You Need One?

So, you have a customer telling you they need your SOC 1 report, but you do not currently have one and you need guidance on how to obtain one. This is a common problem we see in clients and is generally a positive sign that your firm is growing and obtaining larger...

Introduction To The SOC For Cybersecurity

Introduction To The SOC For Cybersecurity

The rise and institutionalization of cyber-attacks and data breaches within the corporate landscape has justifiably resulted in an atmosphere of reduced trust among business entities and consumers. Risk management and cybersecurity are consistently listed as top...